|
|
In
this issue...
Feature Article
How to Manage Your Manager
By Karen Wagner
Women Transforming Culture
How They Do It:
Leading a Research Team
By Natalia Nieto
Cultural Corner
Cinema Forum: Critique & Discussion
By Martha Swanzey
News, Recent and Upcoming Events
Download
Spring
2010 Newsletter |
Previous Newsletters Resources
Murray
Hill Institute Newsletter
Spring 2010
Volume 7 No. 2
CULTURAL CORNER
Cinema Forum: Critque & Discussion
By Martha Swanzey
In Tennessee Williams’ play, The Glass Menagerie,
Amanda Wingfield says to her son, Tom, “You go entirely too
much to the movies…why do you go to the movies so much?” He
responds, “I like adventure, Mother, something I don’t
get much of at the Continental Shoe Warehouse.” Well,
our friends who come to our monthly Cinema Forum: Critique & Discussion
(fancy name!) don’t necessarily come for adventure, though
we might occasionally supply it —like when we run out of
Camembert.
They come, we hope, because they are good friends who enjoy and
appreciate each others’ company, have an informed knowledge
of film and are eager and able to comment intelligently on the content
and artistry of the films we show. Our friends who come to
our home on these occasions come from a variety of professional
backgrounds—medicine, law, education, science, engineering,
business, and from a number of countries —Ireland, Austria,
Poland, for example. This variety of experience and expertise assures
a lively and insightful exchange of viewpoints and always a number
of unique and diverse reactions to what we view.
The films are selected by us with a good deal of input from our “regulars.” People
will suggest classics we all know and love or newer films that will
spark discussion and disagreement—the latter always a lot
of fun. Well-known movies shown include Alfred Hitchcock’s Shadow
of a Doubt and Strangers on a Train, film noir classics
like Double Indemnity and Laura, screwball comedies
like Bringing Up Baby, British classics like Brief
Encounter and Brighton Rock, and foreign language
films like East/West and Umbrellas of Cherbourg.
Sometimes we have a little fun with the film and our audience. For
example, when showing the wonderful Alastair Sim crime thriller, Green
for Danger, we paused the film and had our friends guess, on
the basis of clues strewn throughout, who the killer might be, inviting
all to give reasons for their conclusions. When we resumed
the film people were able to see whether they were right or wrong. Also,
we invite any of our friends to introduce a film they have recommended,
to point out any significant features we should note to enhance
our appreciation. On other occasions, we have given little
quizzes following the films to see if folks noticed key elements. For
example, in Shadow of a Doubt, Hitchcock, in order to identify
his villain (Joseph Cotton) with his heroine (Teresa Wright), presents
a number of visual and oral clues involving “two-ness”—two
suspects, two cities, double brandies, two months, two people named
Charlie, etc. “Hey, audience, did you notice?”
We create a friendly atmosphere and loosen tongues with wine and
cheese. We try to recognize the seasons, both by choice of
film and décor. So, for March we would have green decorations
and perhaps The Quiet Man or this year’s selection, My
Left Foot; romance and red in February, The Ghost and Mrs.
Muir; terror and orange and black in October, Invasion
of The Body Snatchers; and something inspirational at the appropriate
point in the liturgical season. We send out an attractive
brochure every three months with the schedule and titles of each
one of the three films for those three listed months. Films
are garnered chiefly from the Netflix collections.
Our house is not large and we do not employ a big screen (although
my husband, Tom, has suggested we do a drive-in movie thing with
people parking in our back yard. I hope he’s kidding!), yet
our friends keep coming and we always have new people. We
have found this to be an excellent way to see people we love on
a regular basis; and we feel that they appreciate the opportunity
to engage in lively and intelligent discussion. We have learned
that film criticism hardly qualifies as an exact science. The
goal is to include a little bit of everything, but to prevent the
resulting chosen films from being just a cinematic smorgasbord —a
case of mere variety taking precedence over true value.
Martha Swanzey is on the Board of Directors for Murray Hill
Institute. She and her husband, Tom, have held the Cinema
Forum: Critique & Discussion in their home on a monthly basis
for ten years.
|
|